“We are so indoctrinated to believe that the bit is control. A greater untruth has never been told.” ( Bitless Bridle UK )
W. Robert Cook FRCVS, PhD
Part II: Bit-induced diseases and other indictments
The Bit as the Cause of the Headshaking Syndrome
In 1979, the author published a four-part article on headshaking in the horse. This was the first major contribution to the literature on a problem that had long been a source of distress and frustration to owners and veterinarians alike, not to mention the horse. In this first series of articles, the author described the history and clinical signs of the syndrome and recommended a protocol for the investigation and clinical examination of affected horses. But, in spite of having spilt so much ink, he made it clear that he did not know the cause of the problem and, therefore, could offer no cure. Thirteen years later he published some further ideas on this problem, though still without claiming victory on the vital question of cause and cure (Cook 1992). By this time, many other workers had been researching the problem but none had been able to recommend a really effective cure.
Over the last six years, however, the author’s continuing research has provided convincing evidence to support the hypothesis that the most common cause of this problem is facial neuralgia caused by the bit (Cook 1999b, 1999c, 2000, 2002a, and 2003). As the syndrome has been such a recalcitrant problem in the past, it is good to be able to report that here, at last, is a treatment that is both logical and successful. The convincing results provide further compelling evidence that the bit is not only an inefficient method of communication but also one that is physiologically contra-indicated.
In the past, many different diseases have been proposed as the hypothetical cause of the seven or more clinical signs that have been thought to define the headshaking syndrome (see Part III, Table I and Cook 2003). Sadly, none of these varied explanations have been supported by a convincing resolution of the syndrome following therapy for any one of the proposed diseases.
The syndrome is named after its most prominent and disturbing sign; the persistent, violent, and spasmodic, vertical tossing of the head at exercise. Other characteristic signs include but are not limited to muzzle rubbing, sneezing, snorting, and a general hypersensitivity and shyness when handled around the mouth, face and ears (see Table I in Part III of this article). High ambient temperatures exacerbate these signs and so also does bright sunlight. For this reason, headshaking horses are often described as being photophobic.
These apparently disconnected signs can now be economically explained on the grounds that, collectively, they are all signs of facial neuralgia. So instead of having to propose a multiplicity of causes, none of which is entirely convincing, this is a unifying hypothesis that explains all the symptoms of the syndrome under one cause. Happily, the hypothesis withstands the crucial test in that removal of the proposed cause brings about either a complete resolution or at least a convincing regression of the signs.
Facial neuralgia is the medical name for a disease that, in human medicine, is also known as tic douloureux and trigeminal neuralgia. It is an acutely painful disease in man, hence the word ‘neuralgia,’ which simply means pain along the course of a nerve. The trigeminal nerve is the main sensory nerve to the face and the largest of all the cranial nerves. In man it is predisposed to a severe neuralgia that is notoriously difficult to cure, as its cause is not well understood.
As the name of the nerve suggests, the trigeminal has three branches (Fig 1). One branch supplies sensation to the bone of the lower jaw, its teeth and to the related soft tissues of the tongue, chin, lips and gums. It also innervates the salivary glands and skin of the ear. It takes its name from the lower jaw or mandible and is known as the mandibular branch. Similarly, the second branch supplies the bone, teeth, hard palate, soft palate, nasal mucous membranes, lips and gums of the upper jaw or maxilla. Accordingly, it is known as the maxillary branch. The third branch supplies sensation to the eye, eyelids, tear glands, skin of the forehead and the nearby nasal mucosa. Unsurprisingly, it is known as the ophthalmic branch.
The author’s hypothesis proposes that the bit triggers both acute and chronic pain along the course of the trigeminal nerve, i.e. trigeminal neuralgia. The pain may be transmitted directly to the brain or be initiated indirectly, by a process of feedback that results in what is known as referred pain. In this process, pain signals from any tributary of the trigeminal nerve in direct contact with the bit may spread to any other tributary of the same nerve, resulting in pain in areas of the face that have no direct contact with the bit.
Fig 1 Showing the distribution of the three main
branches of the sensory nerve to the face,
the trigeminal nerve
Fig 1 Shows the distribution of the three main branches of the sensory nerve to the face, the trigeminal nerve. All the reader has to do to imagine the potential distribution of facial pain is to start from any one of the areas that the bit contacts and to follow the red pathway from there to the termination of the nerve in any other facial area. Some horses will have pain or hypersensitivity in the region of the muzzle, whereas other horses may experience this around the eyes, ears or forelock.
Direct stimulation of the brain by the acute pain in the mouth is thought to account for the violent head tossing. The more chronic pain probably initiates a dull bone ache rather similar to a bad toothache and accounts for a general tenseness of the jaw, neck, spine and limbs. This would explain the stilted gait and short stride that so many bitted horses exhibit; features that disappear when the bit is removed. When we have toothache we walk gingerly and do not feel like running. The horse may feel the same but when obliged to exercise experiences intermittent muscle spasms in the neck that produce the head tossing.
Pain signals will be sent directly to the brain from any portion of the gums, lips, hard palate, tongue, and teeth that the bit may press upon. In the male horse, as can be seen in Figure 1, the roots of the canine teeth lie close to the bars. Pain from the canines when the horse is ‘on the bit’ probably accounts for the higher incidence of headshaking in geldings than mares and the tendency for headshaking to be a familiar problem among horses trained for dressage. A few horses of both sexes will have wolf teeth in the lower jaw (as depicted), though they are more common in the upper jaw. Those in the lower jaw will often go unreported because, being vestigial, they may never erupt. They lie under the gum just in front of the first cheek teeth.
The indirect stimulation may take the form of hypersensitivity, tingling, ‘pins and needles’ or actual pain. Such sensations in the mandibular branch would explain the resentment that many horses exhibit to being handled around the ears. Referred pain from the bars may also travel down the branch of the mandibular nerve that supplies sensation to the tongue. This could result in the tongue itself being hypersensitive and be yet one more reason why so many bitted horses are ‘mouthy.’ The same mechanism can be invoked to suggest that trigeminal neuralgia may indeed initiate pain in any of the teeth.
Referred pain in the maxillary branch would explain the sneezing, snorting and muzzle rubbing of the headshaking syndrome. Indirect stimulation by referred signals down the ophthalmic branch explains the sensitivity to bright light, the rapid blinking spasms, and the shyness to handling around the forelock. Stimulation of the lacrimal glands could also account for the nasal discharge and be a further explanation for sneezing.
The clinical signs of the headshaking syndrome represent a pathological exaggeration of a normal response. A healthy horse will respond to a fly landing on its face with a toss of its head. A horse with trigeminal neuralgia behaves as though it is plagued with a swarm of particularly vicious biting flies that refuse to go away. Imagine this, coupled with raging toothache in both jaws, and the reader will have some idea of a horse’s pain. Tic douloureux is one of the fiercest pains known to man.
Depending on the duration and severity of the neuralgia, removal of the bit brings about a regression of the signs or their complete disappearance. Affected horses may show a more or less immediate improvement or a progressive improvement over a period of several weeks or months. Presumably, many of these horses will be shown, in due course, to have had bone spurs on the bars of their mouth but this correlation has not yet been made.
Most headshaking horses exhibit many more adverse behavioral signs than the seven or so that have traditionally been associated with this syndrome. The author concludes that the headshaking syndrome is simply a subset of the much larger syndrome, aversion to the bit. In other words, facial neuralgia explains the seven or so traditional signs of headshaking but affected horses will almost certainly be exhibiting many other signs associated with the other three F’s of fright, flight, and fight (Part III; Table I).
The Bit as the Cause of Upper Airway Obstruction
Some respiratory diseases that the author has shown to be caused by the bit include dorsal displacement of the soft palate (Cook 1999a, 2002a), epiglottal entrapment (Cook 1999b), and pulmonary bleeding (Cook 1999a). He now recognizes that the bit is also a common cause of abnormal respiratory noise at exercise and responsible for ‘thickness of wind’ in many horses (Cook 2003). It should routinely be considered as a differential diagnosis for any horse that makes a roaring noise. Laryngeal stridor (‘roaring’) is no longer a sign that we can automatically assume to be diagnostic of recurrent laryngeal neuropathy (laryngeal hemiplegia). Deformity of the windpipe and further obstruction of the airway is a common defect and occurs much more frequently than has generally been supposed. The author is of the opinion that this is a long-term effect of airway obstruction caused by the bit. Finally, this same effect may be a factor in the cause of small airway disease.
The tip of the tongue is like the tip of an iceberg … there is a lot more tongue behind the tip. The tongue is a long and bulky organ. In an adult horse it measures about 35 cm (14 inches). A reminder of the tongue’s length can be gained from the fact that its root is suspended from the same bony scaffolding that supports the larynx (voice box). Any thing that causes the tip of the tongue to move, such as the bit, is likely to cause the root to move and, therefore, the soft palate. The tongue is a powerful muscular organ but also a highly tuned sense organ. By taste and touch it selects food and by its motor power it plays a critical part in the mastication and swallowing of food. The tongue has predominantly digestive functions. It is active during feeding but should be at rest during exercise. As in all mammals, the horse has evolved to eat or exercise. It cannot carry out both activities simultaneously. And yet by placing a bit in its mouth this is precisely what man expects it to do.
In the exercising horse at liberty, the lips are closed; there is no air in the mouth; the immobile tongue occupies the entire space within the cavity of the mouth and the digestive part of the throat under the soft palate; and salivation is in abeyance. In the exercising horse when ridden with a bit in its mouth, the seal of the lips is broken; the jaw may be frankly open; air enters the mouth and digestive part of the throat; the tongue is constantly on the move; and salivation is stimulated.
The above responses triggered by the bit are digestive system responses. All these responses are diametrically opposed to the respiratory system responses required for exercise. Because of these, a bit interferes with the horse’s ability to breathe properly at exercise. Since a running horse takes one stride for every breath, if it cannot breathe properly it cannot stride properly. As these two functions are impaired, together with other cardiovascular functions crucial to exercise, a bit prevents a horse from performing to its full potential. The details of how the bit causes confusion in the horse’s throat have been explained and illustrated in previous articles (Cook 1999b, 1999c, 2000, 2002a). A summary follows here. A cascade of respiratory events occurs in which respiratory obstruction progresses from mild to severe and even fatal. In any one bitted horse, the degree of asphyxiation will vary according to the nature of the exercise.
- A bit is frequently, though incorrectly, used to bring about poll flexion
- Poll flexion obstructs the airway at the throat
- A bit causes a horse to open its mouth and move its tongue
- This allows air to enter the mouth and the digestive part of the throat, which elevates the soft palate and obstructs the respiratory part of the throat
- Elevation of the soft palate can lead to dorsal displacement of the soft palate (DDSP) and ‘choking-up’
- It is also responsible for the development of epiglottal entrapment
- Obstruction of the throat airway can lead to a partial collapse of the laryngeal airway
- Obstruction in the different sections of the airway are additive and their effects most severe at the termination of the airway (the lungs)
- Obstruction in throat and larynx leads to dynamic collapse of the windpipe
- Long-term obstruction leads to permanent deformity of the windpipe (‘scabbard trachea’) and yet further obstruction
- The delicate air sacs of the lung cannot function properly because of the abnormally high suction pressures that an airway obstruction generates on inspiration
- All of the above traumatizes the bronchioles of the lung and, in the author’s opinion, leads to the development of small airway disease
- Heavily blood-stained fluid gets sucked out of the capillaries into the tissues of the lung and the air sacs
- Pulmonary edema develops (asphyxia-induced pulmonary edema is the author’s preferred name for exercise-induced pulmonary hemorrhage, commonly referred to as ‘bleeding’ or EIPH)
- ‘Bleeding’ causes severe chest pain and exacerbates the asphyxia
- The horse may die from acute pulmonary congestion and heart failure
- Or it may simply stop racing because of pain, a lack of oxygen and extreme fatigue
- Fatigue leads to falls
- Falls cause broken legs
- Broken legs may necessitate euthanasia
The Bit as a Welfare Problem for Horse and Rider
Any method of communication that has so many harmful side effects must surely be classified as contraindicated and unacceptable. But solely because the bit method is painful it should also be regarded as inhumane. Aside from the humanitarian issue, the bit method is contrary to the best interests of a rider aiming at developing a harmonious partnership with her horse and achieving optimum performance. An athlete in pain cannot and will not perform well. Pain reduces both the ability and the desire to perform and is a potent source of accidents to rider and horse.
There is no right way of doing the wrong thing. In the author’s opinion, the bit method of communication is faulty, inhumane, and dangerous. He looks forward to the day when use of the bit will be discontinued and these instruments become objects of curiosity in museum collections.
If a bit is so bad, why has the method survived?
First, much of the evidence that now indicts the bit has only surfaced in the last five years. Secondly, the reason why the bit method has survived so long is that, until five years ago, there was no universally suitable alternative. The situation is rather similar to what happens in the field of surgery. A traditional surgical technique will continue to be used until such time as a better technique is introduced.
Thirdly, as with all advances, one can expect a considerable time lag between the first news of the advance and its general adoption. A high degree of skepticism about any new knowledge is healthy for the protection of the public and the integrity of science.
As mankind has, for five thousand years, been accustomed to the idea that it is both acceptable and necessary to use a bit to control a horse, it will take time and courage for such a mind set to change. Nevertheless, the good news is that horsemen and horsewomen nowadays are nothing like as conservative in their thinking as tradition might suggest. Many are very open to new ideas and thousands of riders have already switched from bits to bitless. An indication of the degree to which this open-mindedness is rewarded can be gained by reading the users’ comments on this website and on www.bitlessbridle.com. The natural horsemanship movement is gathering increasing momentum and this good for the welfare of both horse and rider (Cook 2001a, 2002b).
Why have the traditional bitless methods not displaced the bit method?
The hackamores, bosals, and sidepulls have as long a history as the bit. But none of them has ever achieved the same universal acceptance, probably because they all have practical limitations:
- The hackamores and bosals, for example, provide more than adequate signalling for stopping but are weak on steering
- Conversely, the sidepulls are generally adequate for steering but are weak on stopping
All three types are potentially painful and open to abuse (Table I). Aside from any limitations currently imposed by competition regulations, these traditional forms of bitless communication are not universally suitable for every horse, discipline or rider.
In contrast to these traditional forms of bitless communication and to all the bitted methods, the new Bitless Bridle has the merit of being painless, of providing effective communication for all purposes, and being compatible with the physiological requirements of the exercising horse.
Furthermore, it is incapable of being abused and, with the exception of competition regulations that presently disallow its use, it is applicable to all disciplines. For a general comparison of the merits of each of the methods, see Table I.
A classification of the different methods of communication on the basis of their action
The snaffle bit method can be described as one that provides communication primarily with the mouth (lips, tongue, gums and jawbone). Because the mouth is a body cavity, and an extremely sensitive one, an appropriate name for the method would be the oral cavity rod method. Supplementary action is also possible. Depending on the horse’s head position and the angle at which the reins are held, the snaffle will also pull upwards like a lip retractor on the corner of the mouth. If used in conjunction with an auxiliary aid (such as a drop, flash or grackle noseband) there will also be pressure across the bridge of the nose, especially so if the horse is still trying to open its mouth. Jointed snaffles and, to a lesser extent, French link snaffles have a nutcracker action on the side of the bars as well as the top. Three-ring snaffles exert poll pressure, depending on their adjustment.
A double bridle is made up of a small snaffle known as a bradoon, which communicates with the mouth as above and a curb bit, which has a leverage action and also applies pressure on the chin and poll. The port of the curb is designed to relieve pressure on the tongue and to actually encourage bar pressure. For the purposes of description it could be referred to as the jawbone vise (vice) method, as – except in the hands of a master – it squeezes the jawbone between two pieces of steel, the mouthpiece of the curb and the curb chain. Because the curb bit is placed lower in the horse’s mouth than the snaffle, the pressure is applied to the bars at the level of the body of the mandible rather than its branches (see Part I, Fig 2). A snaffle bit is more likely to apply pressure to the bars of the mouth over the branches of the mandible, especially if it is placed ‘high’ in the mouth.
The Western curb is a leverage bit that is used without any accompanying snaffle. It has a long shank and a spade extension of the mouthpiece designed to apply pressure to the hard palate. It is normally introduced after the horse has been fully trained to respond to a bosal, the curb bit being regarded as the finishing touch for a horse that is already well schooled. When used by a master it is not used, in that the rein is slack at all times. The rein is only used for neck reining, as the curb bit is not suitable for steering. If used by any other than a master it is a painful device because of the huge leverage advantages it offers the rider, coupled with the severe pain that can be inflicted on the hard palate (oral cavity rod plus jawbone vise plus roof of mouth prod). A spade bit is sometimes used in the hope preventing a horse from getting its tongue over the bit.
The mechanical hackamores communicate primarily by pressure across the bridge of the nose and the chin, with some secondary pressure across the poll. For descriptive purposes it could be called the muzzle vise (vice) method, as it squeezes the whole of the muzzle between a firm noseband and a chain in the chin groove.
The English hackamores and the sidepulls rely primarily on nose pressure only. They could be called the bridge-of-nose hoop method.
The Bitless Bridle, however, communicates by an almost trivial degree of pressure. This pressure, such as it is, is distributed around the whole of the head, i.e. across the bridge of the nose, under the chin, along the side of the cheek, and over the poll (Fig 2).
Fig 2 Showing the crossover feature
and function of the Bitless Bridle
Fig 2 The diagram on the right is a worm’s eye view of the head, illustrating how traction on the right rein (yellow arrow) results in the distribution of pressure to the left side of the head. The red arrows indicate only some of the areas that are squeezed, for pressure is also applied to the poll, the bridge of the nose and under the jaw.
Its action can best be described as a benevolent headlock or a whole-head-hug (Table I). The bridle distributes mild pressure over a large area of relatively insensitive tissue, whereas the oral cavity rod method focuses a high pressure on extremely sensitive tissue.
Furthermore, with the whole-head-hug method whatever pressure is applied at the level of the rider’s hands is dampened before it gets applied to the tissues of the head. Contrast this with the leverage bit method (jawbone vise method) in which whatever pressure is applied to the reins is not only focused on a small area of sensitive tissue in the mouth but is actually magnified three or four times.
The crossover feature of the whole-head-hug method means that, even when a horse spooks and a rider instinctively hangs onto the reins to regain balance, the amount of pressure is never capable of causing pain. This means that whatever caused the horse to spook in the first instance is not automatically followed by a sudden pain. The result is that the horse recovers from the spook more readily and does not have a further incentive to bolt. Furthermore, the next time it sees the same monster, it will not associate it with a sudden pain in its mouth and the spook will be less likely to escalate.
Comparison of main methods of communication
| Method |
Bridle |
Action
(Distribution of pressure) |
Stopping |
Steering |
Suitability for all uses |
Potential for causing pain |
| Bits |
Snaffle |
Oral cavity rod + corner of lips retractor |
2 |
2 |
(3) |
3 |
| Snaffle + auxiliary noseband (eg Drop, Flash or Grackle) |
Oral cavity rod + corner of lips retractor + muzzle and jawbone vise [vice] |
2 |
2 |
(3) |
3 |
| Double Bridle (Curb and bradoon) |
Oral cavity rod + corner of lips retractor + jawbone vise [vice] + poll pressure |
2 |
2 |
(2) |
3 |
| Western curb with long shank, curb strap & spade or spoon |
Oral cavity rod + jawbone vise [vice] and poll pressure + roof of mouth prod (unless used with feather-light hands) |
1 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
| Gag bits |
Oral cavity rod + longitudinal axis vise [vice] (corner of lips to poll) |
3 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
| Bitless |
Mechanical Hackamore |
Muzzle vise [vice] |
2 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
| Western Hackamore or la jaquima (bosal, latigo, fiador, & mecate) |
Muzzle vise [vice] |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
| Sidepull |
Bridge of nose hoop |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
| English or jumping hackamore |
Bridge of nose hoop |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
| Bitless Bridle |
Whole-head-hug |
3 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
Table I: A comparative classification of the modes of action of the main methods of communication, together with a subjective grading of each method’s efficiency on a scale from zero to three. The potential for inflicting pain is also graded on the same scale. A figure in parenthesis indicates that although the bit is widely used there are good reasons why it should not be
Copyright © W. Robert Cook FRCVS, PhD 2003,
Part III: Behavioral Profiling Questionnaire
Some comments on the questionnaire
The questionnaire is available as a pdf download here – you will need Acrobat Reader to view & print it – if that program is not already installed on your computer it is available as a free download by clicking the following link 
]. Also available as a printed document (free of charge) in our online shop.
By completing the first column of the questionnaire in Table I at a time when a bit is in use, a rider can be alerted to the presence of bit-induced problems. A rider may not have previously suspected that many of the problems she was experiencing with her horse were even caused by the bit. The majority of the 95 problems listed in the questionnaire are most commonly caused by the bit. Over a quarter of the problems are exclusively caused by the bit. Nevertheless, there are many that are non-specific and could be attributed either to the bit or to pain from some other source (e.g. the saddle or the shoes).
By completing the second column of the questionnaire after the bit has been removed, it is possible to generate a tally of those problems that are bit-induced (generally a surprisingly long list) and to highlight those remaining problems for which some alternative explanation needs to be sought. If the second column is completed within one or two weeks of adopting the whole-head-hug method, following years of bit use, some of the persisting problems may still be bit-induced but simply need a little more time to resolve. This applies, especially, to trigeminal neuralgia but the memory of fear may also take time to fade.
The questionnaire serves the rider as an aid to diagnosis and as a guide to treatment. It provides the rider with a means of differentiating, for example, between a few behavioral problems that are inherent to the character of the horse and the many behavioral problems that are caused, albeit unintentionally, by the rider inflicting bit pain. Many horsemen have been pleasantly surprised to discover that some trait in their horse that they presumed to be inborn and, therefore, a permanent character flaw was in fact amenable to correction by simply removing the bit. Horsemen who are under the impression that their horse does not hate the bit may change their mind after reading Table I.
A collection of these questionnaires serves as a database for future research. In addition, the author can use the first half of the questionnaire (the bitted behavior profile) as a basis for advising a rider about a problem they are experiencing with their horse.
The questionnaire is based on an article published earlier in the year (Cook 2003), where the problems that had been solved in 605 horses by removing the bit were listed in their descending order of frequency. That material has now been updated and rearranged for the purpose of forming a questionnaire.
In compiling the original table, the author learned two things worth emphasizing. Before studying the users’ reports, he had not appreciated the extent to which a bit causes pain and the extent to which this pain frightens a horse. The most commonly reported adverse behavioral effects were classifiable under the four F’s of fright, flight, fight and facial neuralgia. Similarly, it can be said that, although the bit method is responsible for causing not less than 95 problems for the horse, most of these are subsets of the first four. Fear of pain is the paramount factor, as fear is the motivating factor behind all four F’s. Quite apart from the compelling animal welfare argument, it can be said of bits in general from a human welfare point of view that it is not a good idea to use a method that causes pain and frightens an animal as large and powerful as a horse. A horseman’s adage worth remembering is that pain makes a horse pull.
Results
Naturally, it is unlikely that any one horse will exhibit all 95 problems. The equestrian discipline for which the horse is used will have a bearing on the likelihood of certain problems occurring. For example, dressage horses that are required to perform with a high degree of poll flexion (often and mistakenly brought about by rein pressure rather than by true collection) are most likely to develop the headshaking syndrome. Thoroughbred racehorses, all of which are required to work at their maximum athletic performance, are most likely to develop pulmonary bleeding. Standardbred racehorses that are required to race with two bits in their mouth (a snaffle bit and an overcheck bit) are most likely to develop dorsal displacement of the soft palate. All three of these problems can and do occur in other disciplines but their prevalence is less.
Using the questionnaire, a sample of 12 bitted horses was recognized as exhibiting from 11 to 36 problems, with an average of 23 problems per horse. But after using the whole-head-hug method for periods ranging from four days to six months (average 42 days), the degree to which these problems were solved ranged from 38% to 94% (average 67%). The top scoring horse was an 11-year-old Arab gelding trained for dressage. This horse had 33 problems, of which 31 (94%) were solved after six weeks. When more than two thirds of a horse’s problems can be eliminated in 42 days, simply by removing one or more steel rods from its oral cavity, it serves to emphasize the merit of the whole-head-hug method of communication.
Summary
From prehistoric times until quite recent years, the bit has been thought of as a method of control. But the bit has never worked like a steering wheel or a brake on a car. Use of the word ‘control’ has led to a serious misunderstanding in the history of equitation. A bit is not and never has been a mechanical device for controlling a horse at exercise. At best it is a signaling device for communication. It should not and cannot be used to ‘control’ in the sense of ‘command.’ It should and can only be used to signal a request. The more polite (ie painless) the request, the more likely it is that the horse will comply. Unfortunately, because all bits are foreign bodies inserted into a highly sensitive body cavity and used to apply highly focused pressure on bone, they are – by their very nature – painful. The only way that a bit can never cause pain is for it never to be used.
So if it is not to be used, why do we put it there? Such a non-use standard may be achievable by a few master horsemen riding with a slack rein and a Western curb but even with them the bit still remains an intrusive foreign body that has no business to be in the mouth of an exercising horse. Even though it may not cause pain in the hands of a master it still interferes in other ways with the physiology of exercise (Cook 1999b). A grazing horse is fastidious about what it puts in its mouth. Left to its own devices it would certainly reject any item that faintly resembled a bit. The author concludes that, as a method of communication, the bit is fundamentally flawed. Pain in the mouth causes horses to run (ie bolt) or protest by head tossing, bucking, rearing and many other evasive actions (Table I). Any method of communication that can only be used humanely by an experienced horseman after many years of practice, and that can only be used humanely on an intermittent basis by the average horseman, and that cannot be used at all humanely by a novice, is not a method that can be recommended.
A method that cannot be used without inflicting pain, other than by a small minority of riders is, by definition, not suitable for general adoption.
If one quietly ignores the above there are other problems. Before learning the intricacies of ‘correctly’ fitting and using a bit, an owner has to face the minefield of ‘finding’ the right bit in the first instance. To discover the right ‘key to a horse’s mouth’ riders are expected to have an intimate knowledge of the anatomy of their horse’s mouth. Books on bitting warn that a rider should be able to judge such niceties as the width of their horse’s mouth, the depth of the tongue groove, the fleshiness of the tongue, the concavity of the hard palate, the conformation of the jaw and the status of the dentition. Even supposing a rider had mastered the technique of actually opening a horse’s mouth to make such appraisals, these are matters that remain a mystery to most equestrians.
If one avoids the thorny question as to whether it is possible to select and fit a bit ‘correctly’, one has only to read any book on bitting to be alerted to the degree of knowledge and skill that is required for the ‘correct’ employment and maintenance of such a device. The ‘tongue-over- the-bit’ problem is only one of many problems that a rider is expected to solve. As few horsemen possess the qualifications for what used to be called the ‘making of a mouth,’ the bit method of communication cannot be recommended for the universal application that it has for so long enjoyed.
The average rider can no more be expected to exercise the necessary discretion and skill for using one or more bits than a child can be expected to play safely with an open razor.
The correct selection and use of a hackamore or a bosal also has many pitfalls. Once again, experience and skill is required, together with a period of training of both horse and rider.
In happy contrast, one does not have to be either an anatomist or a master horseman to select and use the whole-head-hug. Subtle variations in the conformation of the mouth and jaw are not of any consequence and even the normal eruption of permanent dentition is no longer a matter of concern. It is still wise to attend to sharp enamel edges on the molar teeth but wolf teeth, for example, no longer have to be removed and there is no need to create ‘bit seats.’ Unlike when using a bit or a hackamore, a rider cannot hurt a horse with a whole-head-hug. The method can be used for all horses, in all disciplines, and by all riders, even novices. Horses that are not in pain are far less nervous. Being calm they are also in the right frame of mind to learn, so schooling proceeds faster and with fewer setbacks. A rider does not have to overcome, avoid or treat so many bit-induced problems or survive so many pain-triggered hazards. It is so easy for a rider to make mistakes using a bit.
The whole-head-hug method protects riders from making mistakes because, unlike the bit method, it is virtually impossible to make mistakes. As long as the bridle is fitted correctly (an easy task) there is really no way in which the whole-head-hug method can be used incorrectly and certainly no way in which the method can be abused. As a result, riders discover that they are better horseman than they previously supposed and that they have a better horse than they thought. Training advances more rapidly and a harmonious partnership is fostered between man and horse.
In choosing a method of communication, a rider has the option of hurting or hugging. The bit signals painfully with metal on bone and jeopardizes the safety and welfare of horse and rider. The hug signals painlessly with strap on head and enhances safety and welfare. To the horse it feels like a halter but to the rider it feels like a bridle. The author’s recommendation can be summed up by reversing a familiar phrase … spare the rod and save the horse.
<<Part I | <<Part II
References
Cook, W.R. (1992): Headshaking in horses: An afterword. Compendium on Continuing Education for the Practicing Veterinarian, 14:1369-1376
Cook, W.R. (1998a): “Use of the bit in horses.” Veterinary Record. 142, 16.
Cook, W.R. (1998b): “Use of the bit in horses.” Veterinary Record. 142, 24
Cook, W.R. (1999a): “Asphyxia as the cause of bleeding and the bit as the cause of soft palate displacement.” Guest Commentary. Thoroughbred Times, November 27, pp 18-19
Cook, W.R. (1999b): “Pathophysiology of Bit Control in the Horse.” Journal Equine Veterinary Science 19: 196-204
Cook, W.R. (1999c): The ear, the nose, and the lie in the throat. In “Guardians of the Horse: Past, Present and Future.” Ed: Rossdale,P.D., Greet, T.R.C., Harris, P.A., Green, R.E., and Hall, S.. British Equine Veterinary Association and Romney Publications, pp 175-182.
Cook, W.R. (2000): “A solution to respiratory and other problems caused by the bit.” Pferdeheilkunde, 16, 333-351
Cook, W.R. (2001a): “On talking horses: Barefoot and bit-free.” Natural Horse Magazine 3, 19
Cook W.R and Peters R. (2001b): “Who Needs Bits?” Natural Horse 3, 44-47
Cook, W.R. (2002a): “Bit-induced asphyxia in the horse: Elevation and dorsal displacement of the soft palate at exercise.” Journal of Equine Veterinary Science, 22, 7-14
Cook W.R. (2002b): “On ‘Mouth Irons’, ‘Hoof Cramps’, and the Dawn of the Metal-free Horse.” Natural Horse, 4, Issue 4
Cook W.R. (2002c): “No bit is best.” Thoroughbred Times, October 19, 2002, p 18
Cook, W.R. (2003): “Bit-Induced Pain; a cause of fear, flight, fight and facial neuralgia in the horse.” Pferdeheilkunde, 19, 1-8
Acknowledgments
The author is most grateful to the riders who provided the feedback on which the questionnaire is based. He is indebted also to the curators of the Smithsonian Museum, Washington, DC, the Field Museum, Chicago, and the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University for granting him access to their collection of equidae skulls. Figure 2 was drawn with the help of anatomical specimens provided by Dr. M. Kumar, Tufts University and tomograms provided by Dr. Ross Tucker, Washington State University.
Copyright © W. Robert Cook FRCVS, PhD 2003,
Pat Voisey 